USPTO serial 88411864
PINO FRIGIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OAKES, ANNA JENNIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PINO FRIGIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLOMBIA, CA
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLOMBIA, CA
Vancouver, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Steiner, Esq.
Mark A. Steiner, Esq. Duane Morris LLPOne Market PlazaSpear Tower - Suite 2200San Francisco, CA 94105-1127Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed materials, namely, coasters of cardboard, notecards, postcards, posters | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Glassware, namely, drinking glasses, bottle openers, mugs | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Headwear; Clothing, namely, t-shirts, sweaters, tank tops, ball caps, knitted caps, beanies | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, wine-flavored slushy drinks | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely, slushy drinks prepared with wine and distilled spirits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CRL PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by CRL PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by Cactus Restaurants Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named PINO FRIGIO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 4, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 6, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |