USPTO serial 88412994
GOODNIGHT KIDDO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOODNIGHT KIDDO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacy J. Grossman
Stacy J. Grossman Law Office of Stacy J. Grossman PLLC500 Mamaroneck Avenue, Suite 320Harrison, NY 10528UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for sleep health meditation instruction; downloadable software applications for meditation purposes, namely, software applications for the provision of sleep health and meditation instructions; downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for provision of sleep health and meditation instructions, and meditations; prerecorded audio and video recordings in the field of sleep health meditation; downloadable multimedia podcasts featuring sleep health meditations accessible via the internet; downloadable audio recordings and downloadable multimedia files in the field of meditation accessible via the internet and via voice command through wireless home communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | providing multimedia podcasts featuring sleep health meditations accessible via the internet; providing online non-downloadable audio and multimedia recordings in the field of meditation accessible via the internet and via voice command through wireless home communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for sleep health meditation instruction; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software applications for meditation purposes, namely, software applications for the provision of sleep health and meditation instructions; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for provision of sleep health and meditation instructions, and meditations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |