USPTO serial 88414720
FLUENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROOKSHIRE, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 137
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLUENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel J. Piotrowski
Daniel J. Piotrowski Signify Intellectual Property1 Van de Graaff Drive, Suite 202Burlington, MA 01803United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LED lighting controls and sensors, namely, for scheduling, dimming, daylighting, occupancy sensing, commissioning, diagnostic and data reporting | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2017 |
| 011 | LED luminaires; lighting apparatus, namely, lighting installations; lighting fixtures; lighting tracks; lighting tubes; cooling units for industrial purposes, namely, heat sinks for lighting; electric lighting fixtures; electric track lighting units; LED (light emitting diode) lighting fixtures; LED lighting fixtures for indoor and outdoor lighting applications; LED lighting systems, namely, LED modules, power supplies, and wiring; luminaires, using solid state light engines or light emitting diodes (LED) as a light source, for horticultural lighting | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2017 |
| 042 | Agricultural research; engineering; engineering services, namely, engineering for the horticulture, irrigation, greenhouses, geosciences, food, and agricultural sciences; industrial design; industrial design services; industrial research in the field of horticulture; scientific and technological services, namely, research and design in the field of horticulture, irrigation, greenhouses, geosciences, food, and agricultural sciences; scientific and technological services, namely, scientific research, analysis, testing in the field of horticulture, irrigation, greenhouses, geosciences, food, and agricultural sciences; agricultural testing for lighting, heating, and cooling systems; civil engineering relating to agriculture and horticulture; conducting feasibility studies in the field of environmental engineering; consulting in the field of auxiliary design for horticulture, irrigation, greenhouses, geosciences, food, and agricultural sciences, namely, lighting, cooling, and heating systems; design, development, and consulting services related thereto in the field of horticulture, irrigation, greenhouses, geosciences, food, and agricultural sciences, specifically lighting, cooling, and heating systems; development and establishment of testing specifications and procedures for the horticulture industry; geoenvironmental engineering; research and development of advanced learning technologies and teaching methods; scientific research consulting in the field of agricultural fertilization; scientific research consulting in the field of agricultural irrigation; scientific research relating to the impact of consumer and industrial products on environmental preservation; technical consulting in the field of environmental engineering; testing, inspection or research on agriculture, livestock breeding or fisheries | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2017 |
| 044 | Consulting in the field of horticulture relating to biochemistry, photobiology, plant cultivation and processing, including phases of breeding, growing, harvesting and post-harvesting | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fluence Bioengineering, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FLUENCE BIOENGINEERING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FLUENCE BIOENGINEERING, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named FLUENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 14, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 19, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 24, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| May 24, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 18, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |