USPTO serial 88416659
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley L. Cohn
Bradley L. Cohn PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD & GERALDS200 S. WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 2900CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computer asset management services, namely, asset management of computer hardware in the nature of inventory management | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Computer consulting services, namely, computer consulting related to the installation of computer hardware for creating, managing, and deploying computing infrastructure services for both cloud and on-premise systems; technical consulting services, namely, technical consulting related to the installation of computer hardware for creating, managing, and deploying computing infrastructure services for both cloud and on-premise systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services in the nature of managed public and private cloud hosting for Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) computer software application management; cloud computing provider services, namely, cloud hosting provider services for storage of customer data; cloud computing featuring Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software for database management; infrastructure as a service (IAAS) and platform as a service (PAAS) both featuring Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) related software platforms for creating, managing, and deploying cloud computing infrastructure services; computer and computer software application consulting services, namely, computer and computer software application consulting related to the research, design, configuration, and optimization and operation of computer hardware and software platforms for creating, managing, and deploying computing infrastructure services for both cloud and on-premise systems; technical consulting services, namely, technical consulting related to the research, design, configuration, and optimization and operation of computer hardware and software platforms for creating, managing, and deploying computing infrastructure services for both cloud and on-premise systems; computer diagnostic services; monitoring of computer systems by remote access to ensure proper functioning; monitoring of computer systems for detecting unauthorized access or data breach; monitoring of computer systems to detect breakdowns; preparation, update, installation and maintenance of computer software; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware, software and network problems; computer virus protection services; technical support in the form of monitoring the security and technological functioning of global computer network systems; technical support services, namely, providing technical advice for customized application software and Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software systems; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting for customized application software and Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software systems problems; centralized end user help desk services, namely, providing global services desk for 1st, 2nd and 3rd level technical computer support and computer application support; Integration of computer systems and networks services, namely, integration and implementation of internet of things (IoT) software and computer hardware devices into an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) computer network platform; consulting services, namely, consulting services related to the development of business analytics software and business intelligence tools in the nature of software to operate in conjunction with Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software and related technological systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Licensing of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2024 | NRCC | NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2024 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 14, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |