USPTO serial 88416728
POGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILSON, MARYNELLE WEST
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristin S. Cornuelle
Kristin S. Cornuelle ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP2050 MAIN ST., SUITE 1100IRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software used to process mobile payments; Downloadable computer software for use in electronic payment and electronic commerce transactions with retailers, merchants, and vendors via mobile devices and other wireless devices; Downloadable computer software for transmitting, processing, facilitating, verifying, and authenticating credit and debit card information and transaction and payment information; Downloadable computer software for ensuring the security of mobile payments over local networks to retailers, merchants and vendors via mobile devices and other wireless devices; Downloadable computer software for the storage, transmission, verification, and authentication of credit and debit card and other payment and transaction information; Downloadable computer application program, namely, software for processing of payments and paying bills; Downloadable payment application software for mobile phones, namely, software for processing of payments, paying bills and transferring money | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable computer software used to process mobile payments; Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable computer software for use in electronic payment and electronic commerce transactions with retailers, merchants, and vendors via mobile devices and other wireless devices; Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable computer software for transmitting, processing, facilitating, verifying, and authenticating credit and debit card information and transaction and payment information; Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable computer software for ensuring the security of mobile payments over local networks to retailers, merchants and vendors via mobile devices and other wireless devices; Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable computer software for the storage, transmission, verification, and authentication of credit and debit card and other payment and transaction information; Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable computer application program, namely, software for processing of payments and paying bills; Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable payment application software for mobile phones, namely, software for processing of payments, paying bills and transferring money | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 25, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 31, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |