Drawing for WARMQDIM

USPTO serial 88416865

WARMQDIM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, JANET H
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WARMQDIM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KEITH R. OBERT

Keith R. Obert WARE, FRESSOLA, MAGUIRE & BARBER LLP755 MAIN STREET, BLDG. 5MONROE, CT 06468UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009light emitting diode (LED) electrical power suppliesACTIVE—
011flexible and linear lighting strips for decorative and indoor use; lighting fixturesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 1, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 16, 2023ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 16, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 2, 2022EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 15, 2022RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jul 22, 2022GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2022GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2022CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 15, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 27, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2022GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2022GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2022CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 29, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 25, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 25, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 25, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 28, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 28, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 28, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 30, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 4, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 4, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 5, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 28, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 26, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 9, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance