Drawing for MILLENNIAL AESTHETIC SURGERY

USPTO serial 88417120

MILLENNIAL AESTHETIC SURGERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GALANTE, JOSHUA MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MILLENNIAL AESTHETIC SURGERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT GARSON

ROBERT GARSON GARSON SEGAL STEINMETZ FLADGATE LLP164 WEST 25TH STREETSUITE 11RNEW YORK, NY 10001

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Surgery; Cosmetic surgery services; Cosmetic and plastic surgery; Plastic surgery; Plastic surgery servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 1, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 1, 2023ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 1, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 13, 2023EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 13, 2022RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Sep 21, 2022GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2022GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2022CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 3, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 4, 2021EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 4, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 4, 2021EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 10, 2021GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Feb 10, 2021GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Feb 10, 2021CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Jan 4, 2021ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 15, 2020PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 2, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 2, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 10, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 26, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 26, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 26, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 1, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 1, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 28, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 26, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 14, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2019ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 6, 2019PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 19, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 17, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 29, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 9, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance