USPTO serial 88418430
VIKING'S WHARF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRICKLAND, CODY S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIKING'S WHARF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DMITRIY O. MAKAROV
DMITRIY O. MAKAROV IPHORGAN LTD.195 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD, SUITE #125BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089-1768UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Lobster restaurants | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 31, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2021 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Oct 5, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |