USPTO serial 88421057
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Saint-Hyacinthe Quebec, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lesley M. Grossberg
Lesley M. Grossberg BAKER HOSTETLER LLP2929 Arch StreetCira Centre, 12th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19104-2891| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Cat food; dog food; edible treats for cats and dogs | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |