USPTO serial 88422349
PROCURIFY PAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGREDA, SAMANTHA LEIGH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROCURIFY PAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan M. Gelchinsky
Jonathan M. Gelchinsky Pierce Atwood LLP254 Commercial StreetPortland, ME 04101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Magnetically encoded debit cards for use by businesses to manage and control spending; downloadable spend management computer software for managing approval and tracking of expenses, online purchase orders and budgeting; downloadable mobile application software for managing approval and tracking of expenses, online purchase orders and budgeting | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Platform as a service featuring computer software for managing business spending through purchase orders, expenses, travel requests, general costs, budgeting and reporting; software as a service services featuring software to manage approval and tracking of expenses, online purchase orders, budgeting and reporting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 28, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |