USPTO serial 88427525
SUGARLEAF LABS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUGARLEAF LABS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
Howard N. Aronson NOLTE LACKENBACH SIEGEL1 CHASE RDSCARSDALE, NY 10583-4156UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Plant extracts, namely, extracts of industrial hemp with not more than 0.3 percent tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) for manufacture of cosmetic oils, vaporizing oil for inhalation, body cream and oral hygiene products, textiles, clothing, shoes, paper, bioplastics, insulation, cosmetics; Extracts of industrial hemp, containing phytocannabinoids and not more than 0.3 percent THC, namely, in the form of resin, oil, liquid, or powder for manufacture of cosmetic oils, vaporizing oil for inhalation, body cream and oral hygiene products, textiles, clothing, shoes, paper, bioplastics, insulation, cosmetics; none of the foregoing including substances other than those solely derived from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | Cosmetic preparations for humans and animals; Cosmetic preparations for topical use on skin, hair, and lips; Cosmetic preparations containing extracts of industrial hemp with phytocannabinoids and not more than 0.3 percent THC, namely, in the form of ointments, lip balms, body balms, salves, topical creams, lotions, bath melts, sprays, massage oils, lotions, and gels; none of the foregoing including substances other than those solely derived from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
| 034 | Electronic cigarette liquid, not including essential oils, with extracts of industrial hemp with phytocannabinoids and not more than 0.3 percent THC on a dry weight basis for use in liquids for electronic cigarettes and oral vaporizers for smoking purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |