USPTO serial 88427555
SYNTAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 1, 2020
- Examiner
- BICE, DANIEL TRAVIS
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SYNTAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $797*
Plus Government fees of $975
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley L. Cohn
Bradley L. Cohn PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD & GERALDS200 S. WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 2900CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Computer consulting services, namely, computer consulting related to the installation of computer hardware for creating, managing, and deploying computing infrastructure services for both cloud and on-premise systems; technical consulting services, namely, technical consulting related to the installation of computer hardware for creating, managing, and deploying computing infrastructure services for both cloud and on-premise systems | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1985 |
| 042 | computer and computer software application consulting services, namely, computer and computer software application consulting related to the research, design, configuration, optimization and operation of computer hardware and software platforms for creating, managing, and deploying computing infrastructure services for on-premise systems; technical consulting services, namely, technical consulting related to the research, design, configuration, optimization and operation of computer hardware and software platforms for creating, managing, and deploying computing infrastructure services for on-premise systems; Computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services in the nature of managed public and private cloud hosting for Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) computer software application management; cloud computing provider services, namely, cloud hosting provider services for storage of customer data; cloud computing featuring Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software for database management; infrastructure as a service (IAAS) and platform as a service (PAAS) both featuring Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) related software platforms for creating, managing, and deploying cloud computing infrastructure services; computer and computer software application consulting services, namely, computer and computer software application consulting related to the research, design, installation, configuration, optimization and operation of computer hardware and software platforms for creating, managing, and deploying computing infrastructure services for cloud systems; technical consulting services, namely, technical consulting related to the research, design, installation, configuration, optimization and operation of computer hardware and software platforms for creating, managing, and deploying computing infrastructure services for cloud systems; computer software application consulting services, namely, computer software application consulting related to the installation of computer software platforms for creating, managing, and deploying computing infrastructure services for both cloud and on-premise systems; technical consulting services, namely, technical consulting related to the installation of computer software platforms for creating, managing, and deploying computing infrastructure services for both cloud and on-premise systems; computer diagnostic services; monitoring of computer systems by remote access to ensure proper functioning; monitoring of computer systems for detecting unauthorized access or data breach; monitoring of computer systems to detect breakdowns; preparation, update, installation and maintenance of computer software; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware, software and network problems; computer virus protection services; technical support in the form of monitoring the security and technical functioning of global computer network systems; technical support services, namely, providing technical advice for customized application software and Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software systems; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting for customized application software and Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software systems problems; centralized end user help desk services, namely, providing global services desk for 1st, 2nd and 3rd level technical computer support and computer application support; consulting services, namely, consulting services related to the development of business analytics software and business intelligence tools in the nature of software to operate in conjunction with Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software and related technological systems; Integration of computer systems and networks services, namely, integration and implementation of internet of things (IoT) software and computer hardware devices into an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) computer network platform | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1985 |
| 045 | Licensing of computer software | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Syntax Systems Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Syntax Systems Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Syntax Systems Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named SYNTAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 15, 2020 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 15, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 26, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 26, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2020 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | EPEN | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 18, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |