USPTO serial 88427693
WELLNESS THROUGH BOTANICALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WELLNESS THROUGH BOTANICALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
Howard N. Aronson NOLTE LACKENBACH SIEGEL1 CHASE RDSCARSDALE, NY 10583-4156UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic preparations for humans and animals; Cosmetic preparations for topical use on skin, hair, and lips; Cosmetic preparations containing extracts of industrial hemp with phytocannabinoids and not more than 0.3% THC, namely, in the form of ointments, lip balms, body balms, salves, topical creams, lotions, bath melts, gels, sprays, massage oils, lotions and gels; all of the foregoing containing hemp ingredients solely derived from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahyrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
| 034 | Extracts of industrial hemp with phytocannabinoids and not more than 0.3% THC on a dry weight basis for use in liquids for electronic cigarettes and oral vaporizers for smoking purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2020 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 12, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |