USPTO serial 88428056
MADE2RECYCLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLOWERS, JAY K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MADE2RECYCLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Todd Timmerman
J. Todd Timmerman Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP101 East Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 2800Tampa, FL 33602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Plastic containers for the food industry; plastic containers for commercial use, namely, for storing and dispensing bulk foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Insulated plastic containers for food or beverage for domestic use; household containers for foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacturing of plastic food and beverage containers for third parties; imprinting of decorative designs on plastic food and beverage containers for third parties | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Custom designing of plastic food and beverage containers for third parties | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Polytainers Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MADE2RECYCLE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |