CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for THE WORLD'S BEST BACKYARD RACE

USPTO serial 88429684

THE WORLD'S BEST BACKYARD RACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE WORLD'S BEST BACKYARD RACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James E. Rosini

James E. Rosini Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP200 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10166UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, hats, t-shirts and sweatshirtsACTIVE—
041Sporting, fitness and endurance events, namely, conducting competitions and games in the fields of ultra-marathon races, track and field events, and organized events involving running, hiking, climbing, swimming and bikingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 28, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 27, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 25, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 25, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 26, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 31, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 11, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 24, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 4, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 30, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 17, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance