USPTO serial 88430321
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle Hon Donovan
Michelle Hon Donovan Duane Morris LLP750 B Street, Suite 2900San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data acquisition hardware; electronic sensors, electric wire and cable, encoded barcode labels and barcode readers, RFID antennae and readers, RFID tags, computer networking hardware, fiber optics, GPS modem GPS radio and mobile devices in the nature of mobile phones, tablets, watches, laptops for identifying, locating, tracking, monitoring, testing, reporting and storing information about the construction, operation, and condition of land and marine pipeline assets for oil and gas and water utilities industries and the construction and operation of infrastructure assets for gathering, transmission and distribution of energy; online and downloadable computer software for identifying, locating, tracking, monitoring, testing, reporting and storing information about the construction, operation, and condition of land and marine pipeline assets for oil and gas, water utilities industries and construction and operation of infrastructure assets for generation and transmission of energy; online downloadable computer software for the production, management and reporting of pipeline and infrastructure information regarding materials, manufacturing specifications, installation procedures, examination results, segment identification, and geographic information | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) in the field of software for identifying, locating, tracking, monitoring, testing, reporting and storing information about the construction, operation, and condition of land and marine pipelines and infrastructure for oil, gas and water utilities industries and construction, operation, and condition of infrastructure assets for gathering, transmission and distribution of energy; Computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services in the nature of data hosting services and user interface access, for the production, management and reporting of pipeline and infrastructure information regarding materials, manufacturing specifications, examination results, installation procedures, segment identification, and geographic information; Consulting services in the field of design and implement computer hardware and custom computer software for identifying, locating, tracking, monitoring, testing, reporting and storing information about the construction, operation, and condition of land and marine pipelines and infrastructure for oil and gas and water utilities industries and construction and operation of infrastructure assets for the gathering, transmission and distribution of energy | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 15, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 27, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 4, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |