Drawing for HIMALAYAN LITE

USPTO serial 88430973

HIMALAYAN LITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIMALAYAN LITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberta L. Christensen

Roberta L. Christensen KOLEY JESSEN P.C., L.L.O.1125 S 103RD STREETONE PACIFIC PLACE, SUITE 800OMAHA, NE 68124

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Industrial saltACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2020MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 11, 2020ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 10, 2020EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 12, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 8, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 18, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance