USPTO serial 88432149
QCP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 20, 2020
- Examiner
- COUGHLAN, REBECCA D.
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with QCP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $425
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas W. Cook
Thomas W. Cook THOMAS COOK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ATTORNEYSPO BOX 1989SAUSALITO, CA 94966-1989UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider; infrastructure as a service, namely, technical support services in the nature of remote and on-site infrastructure management services for accessing, monitoring, administration and management of public and private cloud computing IT and application systems; computer made available in scalable blocks in the nature of on-demand remote computer management services, namely, cloud hosted IT infrastructure management services for accessing, monitoring, administration and management of public and private cloud computing IT and application systems with a user interface; cloud-based data storage for others; cloud-based SQL (structured query language) database development services; cloud-based computer backup services accessible remotely via the internet, accessible online across the globe, or deployed as private cloud solutions on client's local premise; provision of public IP addresses; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable middleware for providing application interfaces between client technology, namely, software applications used for data warehousing, identity management and access control and software applications for access to data storage for others; cloud computing featuring software for use in the provision of managed service resources to access tenant accounts on cloud infrastructure; provision of cloud-based data storage, information technology security services in the nature of computer security services, namely, perimeter security in the nature restricting unauthorized access to networks, network security in the nature of restricting unauthorized network access by users without credentials, endpoint security, namely restricting unauthorized access to client hardware, software, and data; data security, namely, data recovery services and computer security threat analysis for protecting data, offered on-premises, remotely and online; computer software replication, namely, duplication of computer programs; computer disaster recovery, namely, computer data recovery; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for delivering across cloud platforms, local cloud supporting single tenant on premise dedicated infrastructure, local cloud single tenant hosted dedicated infrastructure, remote cloud multi-tenant, and hybrid cloud and data migration services; consultation on moving current client on-premises IT workloads to cloud-based environments, including review of existing IT environment, recommendations for cloud design, and cloud residence of client applications and data; providing flexible cloud-based computing resources and services for business purposes, in the nature of cloud computing featuring software for on-premises, remote and online electronic data storage, data retrieval, data processing, and for remote management and monitoring of databases, voice over internet protocol (VoIP) mobility communications software, telephony applications, and computer applications, namely, software for infrastructure management and monitoring of physical and virtual servers and storage, physical and virtualized network services, physical and virtual firewalls and security, and also having capabilities to provide encryption of data in transit and at rest, and software for data loss protection, and security to detect, block, and report on suspicious and abnormal patterns of computer network access or activity | ACTIVE | Feb 6, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2020 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 14, 2020 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2020 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2020 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2020 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2020 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 12, 2020 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2020 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2020 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2020 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |