USPTO serial 88432383
LUCIDO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUCIDO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
salim katach
SALIM KATACH SALIM KATACH, ESQ.928 HOMECREST COURTBROOKLYN, NY 11223UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Curtain fabric; Curtain holders of textile material; Curtain liners; Curtain loops of textile material; Curtain tie-backs in the nature of textile curtain holders; Curtains; Curtains and towels; Curtains made of textile fabrics; Curtains of plastic; Curtains of textile; Curtains of textile or plastic; Window treatments in the nature of window panels of polyester, cotton and wool; Door curtains; Draperies; Fabric valances; Fabric window coverings and treatments, namely, curtains, draperies, sheers, swags and valances; Fabric window coverings and treatments, namely, curtains, draperies, sheers, swags and valances; Indoor and outdoor curtains; Puffs; Small curtains made of textile materials; Swags; Vinyl curtains; Window curtains | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |