USPTO serial 88433147
DATA COLLABORATION NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DATA COLLABORATION NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katrin Lewertoff
Katrin Lewertoff FERDINAND IP LLC1221 POST ROAD EASTSUITE 302WESTPORT, CT 06880Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for providing an electronic data network to connect data across applications and enable users to collaboratively manage, namely, view, change and share, electronic data across applications through a single interface | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software that provides access to an electronic data network to connect data across applications and enable users to collaboratively manage, namely, view, change and share, electronic data across applications through a single interface | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |