Drawing for APRT

USPTO serial 88433360

APRT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOWELL, MATTHEW P
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with APRT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Penny R. Slicer

Penny R. Slicer STINSON LLP1201 WALNUT, SUITE 2900KANSAS CITY, MO 64106-2150UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035association services, namely, promoting the interests of respiratory and cardiopulmonary therapists, technicians and technologists; regulatory submission management, namely, assisting respiratory and cardiopulmonary therapists, technicians, and technologists, in preparing and filing applications for state licenses with governmental regulatory bodiesACTIVE—
041educational services for assisting respiratory and cardiopulmonary therapists, technicians and technologists in meeting state licensure requirements, namely, providing classes, seminars, and workshops in the field of respiratory and cardiopulmonary medicineACTIVE—
042testing, analyzing, and evaluation of competency of respiratory therapists, technicians and technologists to determine conformity with certification standards; testing, analysis, and evaluation of the professional competency of respiratory and cardiopulmonary therapists, technicians, and technologists to determine conformity with certification standardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2021EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 13, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 2, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 31, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 31, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 10, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 8, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 8, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 14, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 18, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 29, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 18, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 20, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance