CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for HOWMET

USPTO serial 88433916

HOWMET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOWMET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan L. Heller

Susan L. Heller GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP18565 Jamboree Road, Suite 500IRVINE, CA 92612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines and machine tools, namely, packing machines, lathes, gear cutters; embossing machines; rammers being machines; hydraulic control mechanisms for machines, engines or motors; cutting machines; lubricators, namely, lubricating pumps; drainage machines, namely, suction pumps; foundry machines, namely, compression moulding machines, casting machines; printing machines for use on sheet metal; lifting apparatus, namely, mechanical and hydraulic lifts, car lifts; metalworking machines, namely, machining centers; crushing machines for industrial purposes; pumps machines, namely, bilge pumps, electric pumps, oil drain pumps; industrial machine presses; industrial robots; glazing machines for processing metals; saws, namely, power-operated saws; blowing machines, namely, blowing and scotching machines; filling machines; lathesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2021ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 13, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 12, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 10, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 14, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 25, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 10, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 10, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 18, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 3, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 20, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance