USPTO serial 88438781
HYBRID BURGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HYBRID BURGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Aberdeenshire
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay Begler
JAY BEGLER NIESAR & VESTAL LLP90 NEW MONTGOMERY ST, 9TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry, and game; meat extracts; burgers; meat burgers; vegetable burgers; soy burger patties; burgers consisting primarily of meat and soy; meat products being in the form of burgers; prepared processed meats and processed meat products; preserved, dried, and cooked fruits and vegetables; prepared meals consisting principally of meat, fish, poultry, and game; prepared meals consisting principally of vegetables; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat substitutes; snack food containing meat, fish, poultry, and game; sausages; snack food containing vegetables; snack food containing soy; edible oils and fats; meat substitutes; potato crisps; potato chips; potato sticks; fried potatoes; potato fries; potato snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Burgers contained in bread rolls; sauces; spices; marinades containing spices; mixed spices; spice mixes; spice preparations; batter; batter mixes; pastry mixes; puff pastry; filo pastry; pastry dough; stuffing mixes; meat pies; pies containing fish; pies containing poultry; pies containing game; flavourings made from meat and meat substitutes; sandwiches containing meat; seasoned coating for meat; seasoned coating for fish; seasoned coating for poultry; flavourings made from fish; pastries consisting of vegetables and fish; pastries consisting of vegetables and poultry; flavourings made from poultry; concentrated sauce; cooking sauces; dried sauce in powder form; flavourings in the form of concentrated sauces; food dressings in the form of sauces; mixes for preparing sauces; flour and preparations made from cereals, bread, pastry and confectionery; prepared meals; pizzas, pies, and pasta dishes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |