USPTO serial 88440132
REFRESHINGLY DIFFERENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REFRESHINGLY DIFFERENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Guelph, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard E. Peirce
Richard E. Peirce ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC50 South 16th StreetTwo Liberty Place, 22nd FloorPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102-2516Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Blended ready to drink spirits-based alcoholic cocktail beverages; blended ready to drink malt-based alcoholic cocktail beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |