USPTO serial 88446285
PONY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REAMS, CHRISTOPHER THOMAS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PONY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Angers, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul Grandinetti
PAUL GRANDINETTI LEVY & GRANDINETTIP.O. BOX 18385WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software applications relating to the sharing, rental, locating and securing of bicycles, scooters, electric scooters, electric bicycles, mopeds; electrical locks; locks (electric) for bicycles, scooters, electric scooters, electric bicycles, mopeds | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Bicycle sharing services; scooter sharing services; electric scooter sharing services; electric bicycle sharing services; moped sharing services; bicycle sharing schemes operated via a mobile software application; scooter sharing schemes operated via a mobile software application; electric scooter sharing schemes operated via a mobile software application; electric bicycle sharing schemes operated via a mobile software application; moped sharing schemes operated via a mobile software applications; bicycle rental; scooter rental; electric scooter rental; electric bicycle rental; moped rental, bicycle rental schemes operated via a mobile software application; scooter rental schemes operated via a mobile software application; electric scooter rental schemes operated via a mobile software application; electric bicycle rental schemes operated via a mobile software application; moped rental schemes operated via a mobile software application, all of the above services for transportation purposes and not featuring toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 30, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |