USPTO serial 88447499
LITEBRINGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GANESH, HARINI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LITEBRINGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Regensburg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Oliver Platz
Oliver Platz Curi Platz LLP187 Lafayette St5th FloorNew York, NY 10013Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game software downloadable from a global computer network; Downloadable computer programs for video and computer games; Downloadable video and computer game programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of fantasy sports leagues; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games; Provision of information relating to electronic computer games provided via the Internet; Providing on-line computer games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |