USPTO serial 88449340
PENNY THE ROBOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERNS, LEE ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PENNY THE ROBOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
April L. Besl
April L. Besl DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP255 E. Fifth St., Suite 1900Cincinnati, OH 45202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Module system comprised of industrial robots being robotic palletization carriers; pneumatic controls for industrial robots; driving devices for industrial robots; mechanical control apparatus for industrial robots, namely, pneumatic controls for robots, motors and engines for robots; motion control mechanisms for industrial robots, namely, mechanisms for controlling electric motors; linear actuators for industrial robots; control mechanisms for robots, namely, motors for industrial robots; automatic control machines for industrial robots, namely, control machines for controlling electric motors; daily chores helping robots for household purposes in the nature of robotic vacuum cleaners and serving food; industrial robots; robotic arms for industrial purposes, namely, industrial robots; industrial robots for operating machine tools; control mechanisms for robotic machines, namely, pneumatic controls for industrial robots; robot loading devices in the nature of loading machines; robots for industrial use; automatic material handling machines, namely, automatic pallet dispensing machines; handling apparatus in the nature of loading and unloading machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | telepresence robots; laboratory robots; humanoid robots with artificial intelligence; teaching robots; security surveillance robots; intelligence application programs, downloadable for wireless terminals, namely, intelligent software for indoor navigation and traffic control; downloadable intelligence application program for recorded wireless terminal, namely, intelligent software for indoor navigation and traffic control; downloadable smart phone application software for communicating with robots; downloadable application software for smart phones, for controlling robots; downloadable computer application software for cellphones, for controlling robots; downloadable computer application software for digital or electronic tablets for controlling robots; downloadable computer application software for mobile phones for controlling robots; computer software applications, downloadable, for controlling robots; downloadable application software for controlling robots; downloadable computer application software for controlling robots; downloadable computer software for controlling robots; downloadable computer software programs for controlling robots; computer software, recorded, for controlling robots; digital electronic controllers for controlling robots; electronic control systems for machines; electronic remote controls for operating robots, not toys; robots for household purposes in the nature of humanoid robots with artificial intelligence that can perform daily household chores | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | electric vehicles, namely, electrically powered motor vehicles; vehicle bumpers; land vehicle joysticks; trailer hitches for vehicles; hoods for vehicles; reversing alarms for vehicles in the nature of back-up warning alarms for vehicles; remotely controlled land vehicles, other than toys; bodies for vehicles; vehicle wheels; land vehicles; robotic cars; automatic guided vehicles; electrically powered motor vehicles; tricycles, not being toys, used for deliveries; motorized food carts; carts; trolleys; handling carts; motors for land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |