USPTO serial 88449401
GILAN FOODNEH FARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSEN, AMANDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GILAN FOODNEH FARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Port Coquitlam, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Trisha A. Doré
Trisha A. Doré Pampalone Law6695 BroadwayMerrillville, IN 46410UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Food and beverage products, namely, yogurt-based beverages in the nature of carbonated yogurt soda; Food and beverage products, namely, dairy products in the nature of dairy-based dips, diary-based beverages; Food and beverage products, namely, cheese; Food and beverage products, namely, lime juice for cooking purposes, dried beans, canned vegetables, cooked vegetables, dried vegetables, pickled vegetables, and cooked vegetables in the nature of fried and steamed vegetables, dried dates, processed dates, baked beans, cooked vegetables, namely, fried eggplant and roasted eggplant, tomato paste, pickles including mixed pickles, litteh pickles, bandari pickles, garlic pickles and cucumber pickles, processed olives, jams, tuna salad, tuna, not live, potato chips; Food and beverage products, namely, dairy-based dips, namely, kashk | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Food and beverage products, namely, tea, dairy products in the nature of ice cream, herbal food beverages, non-alcoholic water-based beverages also containing herbal extracts, herbal tea, flavored water enhanced with spices, spiced tea, botanical teas, halva, sugar, sugar cubes, crystal sugar, sesame seed paste, namely, tahini, sauces, namely, kashk, pomegranate paste, pottage macaroni, vinegar, syrups for flavoring food or beverages, namely, syrups and oxymel syrup, rice, pastas, honey, rice vermicelli, bread, molasses, pita chips, pretzel chips, and rice chips, cookies, corn-based snacks, spices, edible salt | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Food and beverage products, namely, fresh dates, raw dates, raw olives, fresh olives | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Food and beverage products, namely, non-alcoholic carbonated drinks, distilled drinking water, bottled water, lime juice for use in the preparation of beverages, fruit juices in the nature of verjuice, flavored water, namely, rose water, fruit beverages and fruit juices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gilan Import Export Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named GILAN FOODNEH FARD
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2020 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |