USPTO serial 88449654
IPD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IPD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heedong Chae
Heedong Chae LUCEM, PC660 S FIGUEROA ST, SUITE 1200LOS ANGELES, CA 90017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Batteries and battery chargers; Battery cables; Battery charge devices; Battery chargers for mobile phones; Battery chargers for tablet computers; Battery chargers; battery charging cables; battery charging devices; Battery packs for charging portable electronic devices; Battery packs; Auxiliary battery packs; Cell phone battery chargers for use in vehicles; Cell phone battery chargers; cell phone cradles for battery charging; Chargers for batteries; Chargers for electric batteries; Battery charger for smart phones; Charging appliances for rechargeable equipment; Battery charging cradle for personal digital electronic devices, namely, cell phones, tablet computers, MP3 players, smartphones, smart watches, personal digital assistants, wireless ear phones, wireless ear buds and wireless ear pieces; Battery charging mount for personal digital electronic devices, namely, cell phones, tablet computers, MP3 players, smartphones, smart watches, personal digital assistants, wireless ear phones and wireless ear buds; Battery charging stand for personal digital electronic devices, namely, cell phones, tablet computers, MP3 players, smartphones, smart watches, personal digital assistants, wireless ear phones and wireless ear buds; Battery charging stand for smart phones; Data cables; Electric batteries; Electric charging cables; Electric control devices for electrical charging; Electric storage batteries; Electrical cells and batteries; Micro USB cables; Mobile telephone batteries; portable battery rechargers; USB cables for cellphones; USB cables; USB charging ports for use in vehicles; USB charging ports; Wireless chargers; Wireless charging devices, namely, wireless chargers for portable electronic devices; Wireless charging pads for smartphones; all of the foregoing adapted for consumer use and none of the foregoing specially adapted for use in aircraft | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 24, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2019 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 8, 2019 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 8, 2019 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 31, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |