USPTO serial 88450216
SMART STEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCARTHY, BRIDGET ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMART STEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brianna M. Schonenberg, George S. Pavlik, Amy L. Hammer, Kathleen A. Rheintgen, Ted J. Barthel, Eugenia G. Carter, Michael J. Cronin, Melinda S. Giftos, Laura Grebe, and every member and every attorney at law associated with the firm of Husch Blackwell LL
Brianna M. Schonenberg, George S. Pavlik, Amy L. H HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP511 North Broadway, Suite 1100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Non-metal building materials, namely, wall base moldings, stair nosing, stair treads, rubber flooring, and vinyl flooring | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 3, 2021 | EXDD | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED | — |
| May 27, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 3, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 3, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |