USPTO serial 88457883
LITIGATION MITIGATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BODRI, KRISTIN MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LITIGATION MITIGATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM G LANE
WILLIAM G LANE LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM G. LANEPO BOX 5445LA QUINTA, CA 92248Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | A computer based system for the management of an organization that hires and employs people for the operation of the organization. An object of the system is to assist the organization in in complying will all such laws and regulations relating to employees so that that employees of the organization receive all their employment rights under the laws and regulations. Another object is to provide a safe workplace for the employees. The system also will minimize litigation between employee applicants, employees and former employees and the organization and provide information regarding the employer-employee relationship from the hiring step to the termination step if any. Any designated employee of the organization can input information into the system, but access to the information in the system is on a graded scale and only authorized employees can access that information from the system and each employee can only access information that they are authorized to access under their authorization. The system provides all employees with a private communication channel to voice employee related complaints, safety issues, harassment issues and/or discrimination issues. The system will store records of the organizations steps to comply with the laws and regulations, the relevant information regarding the employee from the time of the hiring process to the time of termination, including job and performance reviews, complaints that the employee has filed against the employer or other employees of the organization, the organizations response to such complaints, reported safety issues and the companies response to safety issues, any employee accidents and the organizations response to such accidents, any reported employee harassment and the organizations response to such harassment, any reported employee discrimination and the organizations response to such reported discrimination, and any reported retaliation to an employee for reporting the aforementioned claims and the organizations response to reports of such retaliation. The system also provides a means for employees to report on or identify new business opportunities for the organization and to report on or identify new intellectual properties, such as inventions and copyright works, that the employees have, or are in the process of creating, or could create for the organization | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |