USPTO serial 88458583
OPTCONNECT EMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARR, PATRICK C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPTCONNECT EMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GLENN A GUNDERSEN
GLENN A GUNDERSEN DECHERT LLP2929 ARCH STREET, CIRA CENTREPHILADELPHIA, PA 19104-2808UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cellular modems designed for use in design, development, management, monitoring and repair of platforms facilitating machine-to-machine communications with remote unattended automated teller machines, cash automation systems, commercial laundry equipment, vending machines, self-service retail point-of-sale devices, and agricultural equipment; downloadable software designed for providing remote management and monitoring technological functions of remote unattended automated teller machines, cash automation systems, commercial laundry equipment, vending machines, self-service retail point-of-sale devices, and agricultural equipment via computer networks, wireless networks or the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing remote management and monitoring technological functions of remote unattended automated teller machines, cash automation systems, commercial laundry equipment, vending machines, self-service retail point-of-sale devices, and agricultural equipment via computer networks, wireless networks or the Internet; providing on-line non-downloadable software designed for providing remote management and monitoring technological functions of remote unattended automated teller machines, cash automation systems, commercial laundry equipment, vending machines, self-service retail point-of-sale devices, and agricultural equipment via computer networks, wireless networks or the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 6, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 19, 2023 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | RMDT | EXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB | — |
| May 4, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2019 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |