USPTO serial 88463264
SIMPLICITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COGAN, BRITTNEY LORRAINE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 686 means your mark is published in the USPTO Official Gazette and in the 30-day opposition period. If no opposition is filed, prosecution typically continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. Monitor the opposition window. After it closes, watch for Notice of Allowance (intent-to-use) or registration (use-based).
Need help with SIMPLICITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Schnider
David Schnider NOLAN HEIMANN LLP16000 Ventura Blvd., Ste 1200ENCINO, CA 91436United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for allowing users to send, receive, and track data, messages, photos, videos and other audiovisual content through electronic, beacon and RFID, website and mobile communications networks, all for use in the field of civic, political, election, and other governmental services, namely, the public sector, not-for-profit sector, and communications sector thereof | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for use in database management; cloud computing featuring software for use in storing and processing of data; cloud computing featuring software for database management; software as a service (SaaS) featuring computer software for voice command and recognition software, speech to text conversion software, voice-enabled software applications for personal information management; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for sending, receiving, tracking data and audiovisual digital content within the realm of smart city software; software as a service (Saas) services featuring software for providing an integration hub connecting proprietary or related software applications to a user's third party software systems for the purpose of supporting smart city initiatives of municipalities, governments, large corporations, and governing entities; software as a service (SaaS) featuring computer software for others to use for the development of software to manage, connect, and operate Internet of Things (IoT) electronic devices; providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for use with Internet of Things (IoT) edge devices, namely, for data collection, data transformation, and the creation of queue-based data streams for IoT sensor management and processing; application service provider (ASP) services featuring online non-downloadable software, namely, computer software for collecting, collating, storing, monitoring, and processing data related to the operations of a municipality or government; application service provider (ASP) services featuring computer software and providing online non-downloadable software, namely, computer software for creating, authoring, distributing, downloading, transmitting, receiving, playing, editing, extracting, encoding, decoding, displaying, storing and organizing text, graphics, images, audio, video, and multimedia content, computer software for personal information management, database management software, database synchronization software, computer software for accessing, browsing and searching online databases, computer software used to process voice commands and create audio responses to voice commands, and computer software for providing travel directions; application service provider (ASP) services featuring computer software for automating or improving the process of making available, accessing, and integrating open data; software as a service (SaaS) featuring cloud computing software, for use by municipalities, governments, and other organizations, to allow API and dataset access, to provide services in the nature of collaborative and communication software, security and single sign-on software, electronic payment software, and reporting and analytics software, and to provide consistency in user experience between software applications; platform as a service(PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for connecting one or more software applications to third party software systems; software as a service (SAAS) services for connecting one or more software applications to third party software systems; computer services, namely, providing an interactive web site featuring technology that allows users to consolidate and manage accounts and connections to existing and emerging application programming interfaces; all of the foregoing services for use in the field of civic, political, election, and other governmental services, namely, the public sector, not-for-profit sector, and communications sector thereof | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 23, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 21, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 15, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 8, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 16, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |