Drawing for A MONKEYPAW PRODUCTION

USPTO serial 88465084

A MONKEYPAW PRODUCTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BERLIN, JUSTIN E
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with A MONKEYPAW PRODUCTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth A, Feinswog

400 CORPORATE POINTESUITE 300CULVER CTIY, CA 90230

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cell phone cases; Downloadable computer game software for use on cellular phones; DVDs featuring podcasts, radio programs, recordings of live events, television programs and Internet and wireless computer programs; compact discs featuring music; downloadable musical sound recordings; downloadable video recordings featuring movies, films, podcasts, radio programs, recordings of live events, television programs and and Internet and wireless video programs; Computer game programmes downloadable via the Internet; computer game discs; video game discs and recorded computer game programs; electronic game discs; downloadable electronic game programs and electronic game software; downloadable video digital game software and video game softwareACTIVE—
041Production of television programs, entertainment multimedia content for television, the Internet and wireless devices, podcasts, radio programs, live events; book publishing, namely, production of books; electronic games services provided by means of the InternetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 25, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 25, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2021NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 2021DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 6, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 19, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 19, 2021DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2021ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 14, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 22, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 28, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 8, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 19, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 19, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 12, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance