USPTO serial 88468811
COGNIA CONSULTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, CHRISTOPHER J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COGNIA CONSULTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lloyd G. Farr
Lloyd G. Farr NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP301 S. COLLEGE STREETSuite 2300, IP DepartmentCHARLOTTE, NC 28202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Consultation in the field of improvement of public and non-public education systems and programs; consulting in the field of K-12 educational systems; research in the field of education; educational services, namely, providing educational conferences and programs, and providing live and on line seminars and workshops and courses of instruction, in the fields of school and district accreditation and improvement of public and non-public education systems and programs; providing information and news in the fields of teaching methodology and education; conducting training workshops and seminars for professional development in the field of educational assessment, including using assessment results for school improvement and enhancing curriculum and instruction, onsite administration, standards-based classrooms, evaluating student work, and classroom assessment; providing educational and professional development services, namely, conducting training workshops and seminars in the field of creation, development, analysis and use of test/assessment data for school and program improvement, improvements to curriculum and instruction, standards-based education, evaluating student work, and classroom assessment; consulting in the field of school improvement, namely, consulting regarding the underlying cause of issues or problems and how to resolve them | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for use by schools, school systems, and other educational organizations for improving the effectiveness and quality of an educational learning environment and for facilitating, managing, evaluating and tracking progress of related plans and tasks; application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use by educational institutions to merge process, content, data and technology into a web-based platform that supports end to end management of school improvement, accreditation processes and compliance monitoring; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software in the field of school improvement, accreditation processes and compliance monitoring | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COGNIA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by COGNIA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Advance Education, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named COGNIA CONSULTING
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 2, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 19, 2020 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 12, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 22, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 10, 2019 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 10, 2019 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 3, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |