USPTO serial 88469178
BTV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEAUDRY-TORRES, FAITH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BTV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Henan Province, CN
Henan Province, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEVASENA REDDY
1570 HERITAGE BAY DRIVESAN JOSE, CA 95138UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Baby monitors; Camcorders; Cameras; Car video recorders; Digital photo frames; Divers' masks; Electric door bells; Electronic collars to train animals; Galvanic cells; Locks, electric; Portable media players; Power inverters; Power supply connectors and adaptors for use with portable electronic devices; Reflective safety vests; Remote controls for radios, televisions, air conditioner; Security surveillance robots; Set-top boxes; Smoke detectors; Spirit levels; Sunglasses; Surveying instruments; Tape recorders; Electric buzzers; Electric light dimmers; Slide or photograph projection apparatus | ABANDONED | May 10, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 8, 2020 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 2020 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 2020 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 27, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |