USPTO serial 88469917
COREMARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 7, 2020
- Examiner
- NKOJO, RHODA K
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with COREMARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
EMBEDDED MICROPROCESSOR BENCHMARK CONSORTIUM
Hillsboro, OR, US
Other trademarks owned by EMBEDDED MICROPROCESSOR BENCHMARK CONSORTIUM
EMBEDDED MICROPROCESSOR BENCHMARK CONSORTIUM
Hillsboro, OR, US
Other trademarks owned by EMBEDDED MICROPROCESSOR BENCHMARK CONSORTIUM
EMBEDDED MICROPROCESSOR BENCHMARK CONSORTIUM
Hillsboro, OR, US
Other trademarks owned by EMBEDDED MICROPROCESSOR BENCHMARK CONSORTIUM
STANDARD PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CORPORATION
GAINESVILLE, VA, US
Other trademarks owned by STANDARD PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CORPORATION
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph V. Myers III
Joseph V. Myers III Seyfarth Shaw LLP1075 Peachtree St. NESuite 2500Atlanta, GA 30309Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EMBEDDED MICROPROCESSOR BENCHMARK CONSORTIUM
- Other trademarks owned by EMBEDDED MICROPROCESSOR BENCHMARK CONSORTIUM
- Other trademarks owned by EMBEDDED MICROPROCESSOR BENCHMARK CONSORTIUM
- Other trademarks owned by STANDARD PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named COREMARK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2026 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 11, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 7, 2026 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 21, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 1, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | RSHG | REQUEST FOR SPECIAL HANDLING - GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2019 | TPMS | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR-MAKE SPECIAL-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |