USPTO serial 88470600
IX CUSTOM LIBRARY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IX CUSTOM LIBRARY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Fredric D. Tannenbaum
Fredric D. Tannenbaum Gould & Ratner LLP222 N LaSalle StreetSuite 300Chicago, IL 60601Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2026 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 23, 2026 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 8, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 27, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 30, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |