Drawing for OLIYA

USPTO serial 88477573

OLIYA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, JANET H
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 124

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OLIYA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Abraham Lichy

Abraham Lichy The Lichy Law Firm, P.C.222 East 68th StreetNew York, NY 10065UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Bottles, sold empty; Ceramic sculptures, vases, vessels, bowls, plates and pots; Crockery, namely, pots, dishes, drinking cups and saucers, bowls, serving bowls and trays; Toilet brush and toilet brush holder sets; Vases; Holiday ornaments of ceramic; Kitchen containers; Trash containers for household use; Works of art made of glassACTIVEApr 8, 2018

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 31, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 24, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 23, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 22, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 8, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 7, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 12, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 6, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 21, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 26, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 5, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 28, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 21, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 14, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 7, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 28, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 28, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 1, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 24, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 2, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 26, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance