USPTO serial 88479268
APACHI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with APACHI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Shenzhen Bokaize Technology Co., Ltd.
Futian Dist., Shenzhen, CN
Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Bokaize Technology Co., Ltd.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Alpenstocks; Backpacks; Briefcases; Canvas shopping bags; Clothing for pets; Clothing for domestic pets; Credit card cases; Handbags; Harness for animals; Haversacks; Key cases; Leather leads; Mountaineering sticks; Muzzles; Pocket wallets; Pouch baby carriers; Sling bags for carrying infants; Suitcases; Travelling bags; Umbrella covers; Umbrellas; Artificial fur; Business card cases; Credit card cases and holders; Fake fur; Faux fur; Imitation fur; Leather bags; Leather credit card cases; Name card cases; Sports bags; Traveling bags | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |