Drawing for CRAVE

USPTO serial 88482227

CRAVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRAVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Geoffrey Lottenberg

GEOFFREY LOTTENBERG BERGER SINGERMAN LLP350 E. LAS OLAS BLVD., SUITE 1000FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, handheld computers, digital electronic devices, wireless devices and internet capable services, namely, software for users to locate restaurants and for accessing and viewing information on restaurants based on user's food preferences and location, such information including recommendations, menus, prices, ratings, reviews, contact information, and delivery, dining, and pick-up optionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 17, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 22, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 18, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 18, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance