Drawing for CARDCOACH

USPTO serial 88483051

CARDCOACH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LIEBL, ALEXANDRA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARDCOACH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John P. Rynkiewicz

John P. Rynkiewicz ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP601 MASSACHUSETTS AVE., NWIP DocketingWASHINGTON, DC 20001

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer and mobile phone application software, namely, downloadable computer software for assessing consumer credit, consumer credit reporting, analyzing and comparing credit cards and financial loans for consumersACTIVE—
036Financial management services, namely, analyzing consumer's credit cards or loan portfolios and making comparison to other portfolios of credit cards and loans and identification of consumer savings achieved with the different portfolios by switching credit cards or loans; consumer credit consultation services, namely, collecting traditional and non-traditional consumer credit and consumer loan accounts data, evaluation and comparison of available consumer loans and consumer credit cards; credit reporting services; consumer financial loan and consumer credit card consultation; consumer credit reporting services; direct to consumer financial information provided by electronic meansACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2022EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2022EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 3, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 2, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2021EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 31, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 31, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 5, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 3, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 2, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 5, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 3, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 3, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 3, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 7, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 18, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 4, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 13, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance