USPTO serial 88485172
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Roslyn Heights, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J Bryan
1862 GREENWOOD ROADMARSHFIELD, MO 65706UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Entry tickets | ACTIVE | Sep 4, 2018 |
| 020 | Identification bracelets, not of metal, for admission to events | ACTIVE | Sep 4, 2018 |
| 035 | Mobile vending in the field of parks and recreation; Mobile vending in the field of government services; Mobile vending in the field of parking management; Entertainment admission venue control services, namely, the remote verification of ticket validity upon presentation of tickets at an entertainment venue | ACTIVE | Sep 4, 2018 |
| 036 | Financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options using a mobile device at a point of sale | ACTIVE | Sep 4, 2018 |
| 042 | Design and development of software in the field of mobile applications | ACTIVE | Sep 4, 2018 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |