USPTO serial 88489984
GRID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cranberry Township, PA
Cranberry Township, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NATHAN J. PREPELKA
NATHAN J. PREPELKA THE WEBB LAW FIRMONE GATEWAY CENTER420 FT. DUQUESNE BLVD., SUITE 1200PITTSBURGH, PA 15222Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Gas detectors for detecting the presence of gas; downloadable software for use with gas detection, gas calibrators, vapor, gas, fire, and danger alarms, thermal imaging cameras; respiratory protective apparatus, namely, self-contained breathing apparatus and parts thereof; electronic hearing protection incorporated into a communications systems associated with radio communications and telemetry; electronic devices, namely, personal alert safety systems (PASS), fall detection systems and apparatus, utilizing physiological monitoring equipment, location determination and geo-fencing; all the afore-mentioned goods in the field of safety products | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others in connection with gas detection; calibration, consulting services in the field of gas detection; technical consultation in the field of engineering services; computer software consultancy, cloud computing, computer programming, data conversion of computer programs and data, maintenance of computer software, and quality control of safety products and installed software safety services; all the afore-mentioned services in the field of safety products | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2021 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 6, 2020 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2020 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |