USPTO serial 88490114
SUPERCAR SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EBAUGH, MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPERCAR SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy J. Kelly
Timothy J. Kelly T.J. KELLY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, PCP.O. Box 128Bay Head, NJ 08742UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Automotive filters, namely, universal cylindrical double-cone air filters for high performance motors and engines, and adapter rings therefor; and high performance automotive engine parts, namely, intercooler cores, intake and exhaust plenums therefor, exhaust manifolds, turbocharger system piping, and valve covers | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Automobile components, namely high performance engines, gearboxes and chasses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AUTO IP LLC
- Other trademarks owned by 500 Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by 500 Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named SUPERCAR SYSTEM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2023 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 11, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2021 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2021 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 17, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 1, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 12, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 22, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |