USPTO serial 88494488
KITKAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIBAUDO, MICHELLE RACHEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KITKAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
shenzhen, CN
shenzhen, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHIYONG YE
SHIYONG YE 250 W 34TH STREETONE PENN PLAZA, SUITE 2015NEW YORK, NY 10119UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | 3D printing pens; Adhesive tape dispensing machines; Air compressors; Air powered tools, namely, drills, screwdrivers, rivet hammers, saws; Belts for conveyors; Bottle sealing machines; Coffee grinders, other than hand-operated; Electric egg beaters; Electric food grinders; Electric meat grinders; Electric vacuum cleaners and their components; Electrical squeezers for fruit and vegetable; Power drill bits; Power tools, namely, drills, routers, circular saws | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 1, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 1, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 1, 2020 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 14, 2020 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |