USPTO serial 88496569
KITCHENMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KITCHENMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Brown
Jeffrey H. Brown MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP444 W. LAKE ST., STE. 3200CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Battery operated kitchen tools systems primarily comprised of electric immersion food blenders, electric and electric beverage blenders, electric food choppers, electric food grinders, electric slicers, electric shredders, electric graters, electric whisks, electric mixers, electric slicing knives, electric knife sharpeners and electric can openers all for household purposes; Battery operated kitchen tools systems primarily comprised of electric immersion food blenders, electric and electric beverage blenders, electric food choppers, electric food grinders, electric slicers, electric shredders, electric graters, electric whisks, electric mixers, electric slicing knives, electric knife sharpeners and electric can openers all for household purposes and all sold as a unit with a battery charging base fitted for each of the aforesaid components | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Batteries; battery chargers; battery charge devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Battery operated kitchen tools for household purposes, namely, a corkscrew; Battery operated kitchen tools for household purposes, namely, dishwashing brushes being a motorized device for use in washing dishes by hand; Battery operated kitchen tools systems primarily comprised of a corkscrew and dishwashing brushes being a motorized device for use in washing dishes by hand and beverage stirrers all sold as a unit; Battery operated kitchen tools systems primarily comprised of a corkscrew and battery operated dishwashing brushes being a motorized device for use in washing dishes by hand, and beverage stirrers all sold as a unit with a battery charging base fitted for each of the aforesaid components; Battery operated kitchen tools systems primarily comprised of dishwashing brushes being a motorized device for use in washing dishes by hand and a battery operated corkscrew and battery operated beverage stirrers all sold as a unit; Battery operated kitchen tools systems primarily comprised of dishwashing brushes being a motorized device for use in washing dishes by hand and a battery operated corkscrew and battery operated beverage stirrers all sold as a unit with a battery charging base fitted for each of the aforesaid components | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Techtronic Cordless GP
- Other trademarks owned by Techtronic Cordless GP
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named KITCHENMAX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 18, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 16, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 21, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2019 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 4, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |