USPTO serial 88497335
CEDAR+
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CEDAR+?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick C. Woolley
Patrick C. Woolley Polsinelli PC900 W. 48TH PLACE, SUITE 900KANSAS CITY, MO 64112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical additives for use in the manufacture of cosmetics; Cosmetic preparations; Cosmetic oils; Cosmetic creams; Fragrances for use in manufacturing cosmetics, cleaning preparations and insect repellents | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | All-purpose cleaner; Cleaning preparations; Cleaning agents and preparations; Cleaning preparations for cleaning floors, ovens, automobiles, glass and industrial equipment; Household cleaning preparations; Essential oils; Essential oils for use in manufacturing scented products, cosmetics, cleaning preparations and insect repellents; Essential oils for aromatherapy use | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Disinfectants; Disinfectant multi-surface cleaner; Disinfectants for cleaning bathrooms, sanitary purposes and medical instrument; Insect-repellants; Insect repellent agents; Air deodorizer; Air deodorizing preparations; Deodorizing cleaning preparations; Household deodorizer; Deodorizers for carpet; Deodorizers for upholstery; Deodorizers for rooms; Deodorizers for automobiles; Deodorizers for shoes | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Robots for dispensing cleaning preparations, fragrances, deodorizers, insect repellents and disinfectants; Robots and mechanical devices for atomizing of liquids for the application of the liquid and coating of surfaces and materials; Robots for personal use; Industrial robots; Industrial robots for cleaning and disinfecting; and Spraying machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Dispensing units for air fresheners, room deodorants, cleaning preparations, disinfectants, and fragrances; Lawn sprinkler systems comprising pumps and valves; sprinkler heads for irrigation sprinklers | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Lawn sprinklers; sprinkler heads; Sprinklers for watering flowers and plants | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Insect repellent spraying in the nature of pest control services; Insecticide spraying in the nature of pest control services | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Lawn care services; Insect repellent spraying for horticulture; Turf care services, namely insecticide spraying for horticulture | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tesseract Ventures, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named CEDAR+
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2019 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |