USPTO serial 88500281
YACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Abraham Lichy
Abraham Lichy THE LICHY LAW FIRM, P.C.222 EAST 68TH STREETNEW YORK, NY 10065UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer application software for desktop computers, portable computers, mobile phones, and mobile and handheld computing devices, namely, software for enabling users to aggregate and browse diverse existing social media communities and online forums in a single application with a uniform user interface, for providing a simple means to switch between communities, and between different channels and accounts in these communities, for providing a simple means to search topics of interest across communities, channels and accounts, for allowing the performance of other functions, particularly content rating of photos, multimedia and videos as allowed by individual communities, using a uniform user interface | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 12, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 2, 2023 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | OP.N | OPPOSITION NOT INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 19, 2022 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 19, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 7, 2021 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 21, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |