Drawing for ERXDIRECT

USPTO serial 88501724

ERXDIRECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOLODNER, LOUIS FRANCIS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ERXDIRECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard M. Mescher

Richard M. Mescher PORTER, WRIGHT, MORRIS & ARTHUR, LLP41 SOUTH HIGH STREETSUITES 2800-3200COLUMBUS, OH 43215

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for enabling community based pharmacies to electronically receive prescriptions and deliver prescription products within a healthcare delivery network by automating routing, pricing and shipping operationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 3, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 3, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 27, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 31, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 26, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 26, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 26, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 25, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 3, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 2, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance